Citizens joined the fray as the watchdogs for a large contingency of voices for people demanding that scenic highways not be destroyed due to tree removals.Īnd so, on an otherwise uneventful afternoon, a (soon to be former) dear friend in the state’s capital called me. The FOAA and the Department were in great battles over amounts owed and the derivation of removals. But the focus went on to exactly how anyone could appraise the subject tree for its value in front of a billboard face. That, in and of itself, created significant legal issues, not to mention ethical and moral matters. The Department then leveled fines and mitigating costs to the owner of the billboard where trees were removed. If a tree or other vegetation obscures the face of the billboard within that sight-line distance, billboard owners have a right to prune or remove the subject tree, provided they submit an application to the FDOT before the removal or pruning occurs.ĭirty tricks abound, and it was soon discovered or at least conceptualized that the owner of one billboard company would, under the cover of night, remove trees in the front of their competitors’ billboards. These clear sight-line distances may be divided into whatever visual corridor the billboard owner desires however, most billboard owners opt for 1000 continuous linear feet of clear sight-line corridors. In Florida, a billboard owner has a legal right to have 1000 feet of clear sight-line distances.

In this matter, the Florida Department of Transportation ( FDOT), the Florida Outdoor Advertising Association (FOAA), and Citizens for a Scenic Florida ( Citizens) were caught in a quagmire of legal lawsuits regarding the appraisal of trees in front of billboards along Florida’s scenic highways. Have you noticed that signs are everywhere on our highways? But there are rules and laws that govern most, if not all, of them.

Signs signs everywhere signs